Medical Global Academy

August 21, 2026

Evaluating the infertile couple — structured first-visit clinical workup guide for general practice and OBGYN doctors in India
Learning blogs

Evaluating the Infertile Couple: A Structured First-Visit Workup for General Practice

Quick Answer A structured infertility workup at the first visit evaluates both partners simultaneously — not the woman first and the man if she’s “normal.” Male factor accounts for approximately 40–50% of infertility presentations. The core first-visit assessment covers: female — menstrual history, ovulation status (LH surge, Day 21 progesterone, ultrasound), ovarian reserve (AMH or Day 2-3 FSH), and uterine/tubal cavity assessment; male — structured semen analysis interpreted against WHO 2021 reference values. Investigations can typically be initiated before a formal specialist referral is made. Referral thresholds vary by duration of infertility, female age, and findings — this article covers each in a structured format. Most Indian clinical content on infertility focuses exclusively on the woman. Investigations are ordered for her, imaging is done for her, and the history is taken almost entirely about her cycles. The male partner receives a semen analysis only if her evaluation comes back normal — or sometimes not at all if she has an identifiable diagnosis like PCOS or fibroids. This approach is clinically wrong in approximately half of all infertility presentations. Male factor contributes to infertility in 40–50% of couples — either as the sole cause or in combination with a female factor. A workup that doesn’t evaluate the male partner at the first visit is missing the cause of infertility in every other case. This article sets out a structured first-visit infertility workup that evaluates both partners systematically, covers the key investigations, sets realistic referral thresholds, and includes the commonly missed elements of a complete assessment. Doctors who want structured training in managing infertility at a clinical level can explore MGA’s Fellowship in Infertility Management. 40–50% Infertility cases with male factor contribution Both Partners evaluated at first visit 1 year Standard referral threshold (adjust by age) What this article covers Defining infertility — when to investigate The female partner workup — history, ovulation, ovarian reserve, anatomy The male partner workup — history, semen analysis interpretation Investigations summary — what to order at first visit Commonly missed elements of the infertility workup Referral thresholds — when to refer and to whom Frequently asked questions Defining infertility — when to investigate The standard clinical definition of infertility is the failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after 12 months of regular unprotected intercourse. This 12-month threshold applies to women under 35 years of age. For women aged 35 or older, the threshold for investigation shortens to 6 months — because ovarian reserve declines with age and delay reduces the available treatment window. Some presentations justify earlier investigation regardless of duration: Known or suspected ovulatory dysfunction (oligomenorrhoea, amenorrhoea) Known or suspected tubal factor (previous PID, ectopic pregnancy, pelvic surgery) Known uterine pathology (fibroids, previous uterine surgery, Asherman’s syndrome) Known or suspected male factor (previous testicular surgery, mumps orchitis, azoospermia) Female age ≥38 — do not wait 6 months, investigate immediately The female partner workup History — what to cover systematically A structured infertility history covers: duration of infertility and whether this is primary or secondary; menstrual cycle pattern (cycle length, regularity, flow, dysmenorrhoea); previous pregnancies and their outcomes; contraceptive history (including IUD use and duration); previous gynaecological procedures (D&C, hysteroscopy, laparoscopy, Caesarean section); symptoms of ovulatory dysfunction (intermenstrual spotting, cycle irregularity, galactorrhoea); and symptoms of PCOS, thyroid disease, or hyperprolactinaemia. Ovulation assessment Regular cycles of 25–35 days occurring consistently are a reasonable clinical indicator of ovulation in most women — but not a guarantee. Formal ovulation assessment options: Method Timing Interpretation Limitation Mid-luteal progesterone Day 21 in 28-day cycle; 7 days before expected period in irregular cycles ≥5 ng/mL suggests ovulation; ≥10 ng/mL more reliable indicator Timing errors common if cycle irregular LH surge (urine OPK) Starting from Day 10–12 in typical cycle Surge detected 24–36 hours before ovulation False positives in PCOS (multiple LH peaks) Follicular tracking ultrasound Serial scans from Day 8–10 Dominant follicle development and collapse confirms ovulation Requires multiple visits; resource-intensive in primary care Day 2-3 FSH/LH Day 2–4 of cycle Elevated FSH indicates diminished ovarian reserve; high LH:FSH ratio suggests PCOS Single-cycle snapshot; inter-cycle variability exists Ovarian reserve assessment Ovarian reserve testing estimates the remaining primordial follicle pool and predicts ovarian response to stimulation. Two primary tests: AMH (Anti-Müllerian Hormone): Can be measured on any day of the cycle. AMH ≥1.0 ng/mL generally indicates adequate ovarian reserve; AMH <1.0 ng/mL suggests diminished reserve. AMH <0.5–0.7 ng/mL (laboratory-specific thresholds vary) indicates severely diminished reserve requiring earlier specialist referral. Antral Follicle Count (AFC): Transvaginal ultrasound on Day 2–4 counting follicles 2–10 mm in each ovary. Total AFC <5–7 suggests diminished reserve; AFC >20 raises OHSS risk in stimulation cycles. AFC is operator-dependent and may not be feasible in a general practice setting. Uterine and tubal assessment Baseline pelvic ultrasound: Assess uterine size, shape, and myometrium (fibroids, adenomyosis features), endometrial thickness and pattern in relation to cycle phase, and ovarian morphology (AFC, PCO pattern, ovarian cysts). This is the first-line uterine assessment tool available in most OBGYN practices. Tubal patency: A blocked or damaged tube is a significant fertility factor that a basic pelvic ultrasound will not reveal. Standard options: HyCoSy (Hysterosalpingo-Contrast Sonography): Ultrasound-based tubal assessment using contrast agent. Acceptable sensitivity for tubal patency; avoids radiation; requires operator experience. HSG (Hysterosalpingogram): Fluoroscopic or digital X-ray with contrast — provides uterine cavity outline and tubal patency. Standard referral-level investigation where laparoscopy is not the first step. Note: false positive rates for tubal spasm exist — confirm before proceeding to surgical treatment. Diagnostic laparoscopy: Gold standard for tubal and peritoneal assessment — direct visualisation of tubes, peritoneum, and endometriosis. Reserved for cases where pelvic pathology is clinically suspected or HSG is inconclusive. Endocrine investigations: Day 2-3 FSH, LH, E2, prolactin, TSH, and AMH as discussed. Add testosterone, DHEAS, and 17-OHP where PCOS or androgen excess is suspected. The male partner workup The male partner evaluation must happen at the first visit — not as a fallback after female investigations. The reason is not merely philosophical: male factor is present in up to 50% of infertile

Fellowship in Infertility Management — curriculum, eligibility and practice scope for OBGYN doctors in India
Learning blogs

Fellowship in Infertility Management: Eligibility, Curriculum and Practice Scope

Quick Answer MGA’s Fellowship in Infertility Management is a 12-month, CPD-accredited online program designed for doctors who want structured training in the clinical assessment and management of the infertile couple, assisted reproductive technologies, ovulation induction, reproductive endocrinology, and ART protocols. It is aimed at DGO, MD/MS OBGYN, DNB OBGYN, and MBBS doctors working in fertility practice settings. This article covers who is eligible, what the curriculum covers, how the program differs from MGA’s Fellowship in Restorative Reproductive Medicine, and what clinical scope it prepares you to work within. India’s fertility sector is growing faster than the trained clinical workforce that can staff it. More than 1,500 IVF centres are currently operating across the country, and that number continues to increase year on year — while the pool of OBGYN-trained doctors with structured infertility and ART training remains limited. A DGO or MBBS doctor working in a fertility clinic without formal training in cycle monitoring, controlled ovarian stimulation, or ART protocols is managing a significant clinical mismatch between what patients need and what their training specifically covers. MGA’s Fellowship in Infertility Management is a structured response to that gap. This article covers its eligibility criteria, curriculum structure, and what clinical scope it prepares you to work within — written specifically for doctors at the commercial investigation stage who want specification detail, not persuasion content. 12 months Online · after OPD hours CPD Accredited — international recognition ART + clinic Core practice scope What this article covers Eligibility — who the fellowship is designed for Program format and delivery Core curriculum areas Fellowship in Infertility Management vs Fellowship in Restorative Reproductive Medicine What clinical scope the fellowship prepares you for Related programs at MGA Frequently asked questions Eligibility — who the fellowship is designed for The fellowship is open to eligible medical graduates. Based on its clinical orientation — infertility evaluation, ART protocols, ovulation induction, and reproductive endocrinology — it is most directly applicable to doctors already working in or transitioning into fertility practice. Qualification Fit with This Fellowship DGO Strong fit — DGO doctors in fertility clinics or antenatal practice benefit directly from ART, ovulation induction, and reproductive endocrinology modules MD / MS Obstetrics & Gynaecology Strong fit — builds subspecialty infertility depth beyond the standard MD/MS OBGYN curriculum DNB OBGYN Strong fit — same clinical scope as MD/MS OBG; fellowship adds structured ART and fertility management competency MBBS doctors in fertility clinic roles Applicable — particularly for MBBS doctors working in IUI/IVF support roles who want to build structured clinical understanding of the fertility workup and treatment cycle General Physicians with fertility patients Relevant for the evaluation, counselling, and referral modules — less directly applicable to the procedural ART content MGA Fellowship programs require a minimum of 4 years of post-qualification clinical experience. Verify current eligibility requirements on the fellowship course page before applying. Program format and delivery The fellowship runs for 12 months and is delivered entirely online — live classes scheduled after OPD hours, with all sessions recorded and available through the LMS for flexible review. This format allows doctors working in fertility clinics or hospital OBGYN departments to complete the program without pausing clinical practice. The program includes: Weekly live sessions with expert faculty in reproductive medicine and ART LMS access to recorded lectures and structured study materials Case-based discussions covering real fertility clinic scenarios Free e-library access including reproductive medicine references and ART protocols CPD-accredited certificate on completion with international recognition One year of structured mentorship after the program ends Core curriculum areas The fellowship covers infertility management as a clinical discipline — from the initial couple evaluation through to ART cycle management and counselling. The curriculum is structured to build the clinical decision-making framework a doctor needs to function effectively in a fertility practice setting. Reproductive physiology and endocrinology foundations The ovarian cycle, folliculogenesis, the HPO axis, luteal phase physiology, and the endocrinological basis of common infertility conditions — PCOS, hyperprolactinaemia, thyroid dysfunction, premature ovarian insufficiency. Understanding the hormonal architecture of normal and abnormal reproductive function is the foundation for everything that follows in clinical fertility practice. Infertility evaluation — female Systematic clinical and investigative assessment of the woman presenting with infertility: structured history, ovarian reserve testing (AFC, AMH, Day 2-3 FSH/LH/E2), ovulation assessment (LH surge, progesterone, ultrasound), uterine evaluation (saline infusion sonohysterography, hysteroscopy principles, HSG interpretation), tubal assessment, and the integration of findings into a clinical diagnosis. The ART ACT 2021 framework and documentation requirements are covered in the clinical governance module. Infertility evaluation — male Male factor infertility accounts for approximately 40–50% of infertility presentations. The curriculum covers structured semen analysis interpretation (WHO 2021 reference values), clinical history and examination of the male partner, hormonal evaluation, assessment for varicocele, genetic testing indications (karyotype, Y-chromosome microdeletion, CFTR for CBAVD), sperm DNA fragmentation, and decision-making on when to refer to andrology versus when to proceed with ART that bypasses male factor. For doctors who want dedicated male infertility training, MGA’s Fellowship in Andrology covers this content at greater depth. Ovulation induction and controlled ovarian stimulation OI protocols for anovulatory patients (WHO Group I and II), letrozole versus clomiphene citrate, gonadotropin OI, cycle monitoring, LH trigger timing, and luteal phase support. Controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IUI and IVF — long agonist, antagonist, and flare protocols; individualising stimulation based on ovarian reserve; dose adjustment during stimulation; monitoring scan interpretation; trigger decisions and criteria; OHSS recognition, grading, and prevention strategies. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) IUI candidacy criteria, sperm preparation techniques (density gradient, swim-up), timing relative to LH surge or trigger, catheter selection, procedural principles, and expected success rates by diagnosis category. The curriculum addresses realistic IUI success rate counselling — a key element in helping patients make informed decisions about whether to proceed with IUI or move to IVF. In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) — clinical protocols IVF cycle planning and stimulation, oocyte retrieval principles, fertilisation methods (conventional IVF vs ICSI indications), embryo culture, embryo grading systems, fresh versus frozen embryo transfer decision-making, luteal phase support, and outcomes

Scroll to Top